In Utero Tonight!
This story about unregulated ultrasound clinics raises more questions than it answers.
Australian ultrasound doctors say they are concerned about pregnant women using non-medical ultrasound studios to get images of their unborn children.
Sounds terrible, right? Why are we letting these amateurs with a machine near our babies? Will someone please think of the children!?
But nowhere in the story is it said that the non-medical ultrasounds are being used as a replacement for the medically-supervised ones. And the difference is crucial. I can understand the concern if parents are using unaccredited ultrasound “studios” instead of legitimate diagnosis. On the other hand, if the non-medical ultrasound — otherwise known as “entertainment ultrasound” — is merely in addition to the prescribed ultrasound sessions, what’s the harm? The distinction it is not clearly stated, so what’s going on here?
This isn’t the sort of topic I normally discuss on girtby.net, but the ambiguity annoyed me so I went digging.
[Read more →]
I’ve always thought that one of the most important rules to follow for successful blogging (or writing in general) is to not state the bleeding obvious. However, rules were made to be broken, so herewith a short (and non-techy) diversion into the world of Australian Rules Football.